Monday
Jan262009
Suddenly, everyone's being drawn to reinforced vegetation
Monday, January 26, 2009 at 5:59PM
Here's an interesting ad sent to us by Chum follower known as BrownTroutSniffer. For those interested in the battle of vegetation reinforced slope and stream restoration vs. rip rap or compacted soil treatments, take a peek into what's happening here.
Reader Comments (3)
Looks nicer from our perspective, but the problems remain below the surface.
Riprapped banks are bad for rivers and salmonids. Would you rather see an undercut bank or continuous, well-graded (same-sized) rock?? Erosion will be shifted from the grassy armored bank to the next spot downstream. Habitat is homogenized and favors larger-bodied fish--juveniles find less interstitial space.
Riprap is hydraulically efficient--but nowhere near as good at controlling energy as a good mix of habitat--self-formed bed and banks, grasses-shrubs-and woody material on the bank, sorted channel substrates, etc. The difference is in the mix. Ever caught decent fish in habitat associated with woody debris recruited by a river able to erode its banks? Riprap does much much more bad stuff...
This might be a better way **where you've got no other options than hard armor**, but band-aids always wash off in the long run. There are a number of different techniques available that do better by the river.
Fight the Riprap, Man.
Alright, I'm off the soapbox. Moldy Chum is my first click of the day, and I guess I woke up with a burr in my boxers.
Keep up the good work.
There are better techniques out there to restore stream banks utilizing vegetative bioengineering and geo-bioengineering principles. The only place riprap belongs is in a type A stream channel, and to a limited extent type B.